Performing MRI scans before biopsy on men with high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) scores could reduce prostate cancer death rates by as much as 18% versus no screening, while also reducing the harms of screening compared with other strategies, according to a study published on 11 March in JAMA Network Open.
The findings could help clinicians better tailor prostate cancer screening based on risk of developing prostate cancer, rather than simply screening all men based on their age, researchers from University College London said in a statement released by the university.
"The scenario generating the most benefits would be to screen men with a 3.5% risk of getting prostate cancer over the next 10 years -- that is, roughly half of all men aged 55 to 69," said a team led by Dr. Thomas Callender, from the department of applied health research. "Such a program could prevent up to 16% of prostate cancer deaths ... [and] would also be more cost-effective than screening all men aged 55 to 69."
Although prostate cancer is a leading cause of death from cancer among men, "there is no screening program [in the U.K.] because the harms of screening are considered to outweigh the benefits," Callender said.
But men at higher genetic risk of prostate cancer are more likely to benefit from screening and less likely to be harmed, he noted. And multiparametric MRI could potentially help mitigate the harms of biopsy by triaging for biopsy only those men with clinically suspicious disease.
Callender's group sought to investigate whether they could develop a prostate cancer screening strategy that could save lives while reducing the harms of screening. They developed an MRI-first prostate cancer screening protocol -- with MRI performed after PSA screening and before biopsy -- would be more effective than a biopsy-first protocol via a study that used a decision model created from a hypothetical cohort of 4.5 million English men between 55 and 69.
The team created a benefit-to-harms profile that considered potential deaths from prostate cancer, quality-adjusted life-years, overdiagnosis, and biopsies, as well as costs associated with each strategy within a 10-year risk time frame. They analyzed the deaths from prostate cancer with three strategies:
- No screening
- MRI before biopsy based on age
- MRI before biopsy based on prostate cancer risk level, ranging from 2% to 10%
The investigators found that age-based screening using MRI before biopsy for prostate cancer saved the most lives in the study: Deaths were reduced by 18% for men with the MRI-first protocol and age-based screening compared with no screening.
But basing who got MRI scans on the risk level of the men rather than age produced a conundrum -- the number of harms related to screening was lower, but the strategy did not save as many lives as the age-based protocol.
|Impact of MRI-first prostate cancer screening on outcomes based on risk level
|MRI-first screening at 2% risk of cancer
|MRI-first screening at 10% risk of cancer
|No. of overdiagnosed cancers
|No. of MRI scans overall
|No. of biopsies
|Deaths from prostate cancer compared with no screening
|Deaths from prostate cancer compared with age-based screening
As for cost, the team discovered that the most effective screening strategy at "willingness to pay" thresholds (that is, the value a health system would estimate is appropriate to pay for one year of full health in a patient) of $26,000 (21,790 euros) and $39,000 (32,686 euros) per quality-adjusted life-year gained was MRI-first risk-based screening at 10-year absolute risk thresholds of 8.5% and 7.5%.
Callender and colleagues found that the most effective screening scenario would be to screen men with a 3.5% risk of getting prostate cancer over the next 10 years -- a protocol that could prevent up to 16% of prostate cancer deaths and reduce overdiagnosis by 27%, the university said. Screening men at this threshold (3.5%) would also be more cost-effective than screening all men ages 55 to 69.
The study highlights MRI's promise for reducing the harms of prostate cancer screening, co-author Dr. Mark Emberton concluded.
"Our study shows that screening for prostate cancer -- which could save between 16% and 20% of prostate cancer deaths -- might be possible with targeted screening using genetic risk and MRI as part of the diagnostic pathway," he said in the university statement. "This paves the way for further clinical trials to study the real-world implementation of such a screening program."