The European medical imaging display market notched revenues of $110.2 million in 2005 and is expected to grow to $289.4 million by 2012, according to a report issued by market research and consulting firm Frost & Sullivan.
As medical imaging evolves beyond the radiology department, a wider variety of end users are demanding to view patient examinations, according to the London-based company. To view these images, a greater number of medical displays need to be installed, contributing to market growth and leading to a significant increase in revenues, Frost & Sullivan said.
Although the market is witnessing enhanced demand for a wider network of displays, the need for cost savings is gaining momentum. To this end, some hospitals are seeking commodity displays for referral purposes. Further, the lack of concrete, Europe-wide guidelines is encouraging the adoption of this attitude, according to Frost & Sullivan.
The firm said that while the surge in demand for medical imaging displays is driven by hospital digitization, a major impediment is the tendency of end users to opt for less expensive, lower-specification commodity displays. Resolving this issue will be critical in determining future market sales, Frost & Sullivan said.
By AuntMinnie.com staff writers
September 22, 2006
Related Reading
U.S. PACS market reaches $1.1 billion, August 31, 2006
European cardiac PACS market shows growth, June 13, 2006
Asian digital x-ray market primed for growth, February 17, 2006
Cardiovascular disease growth pushes European digital cath lab implementation, February 2, 2006
Cost-cutting drives European SR adoption, January 20, 2006
Copyright © 2006 AuntMinnie.com










![A normal mammogram confirmed by three-year radiologic follow-up illustrates reader-marked regions of interest (ROIs) during (A) unaided (round 1) and (B) artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted (round 2) reading. Each colored dot represents an ROI for recall by a human reader. Readers could mark more than one ROI per case, represented by multiple dots of the same color. During AI-assisted reading, the AI system displayed three visible prompts: two with suspicion of malignancy scores of 35% (left mediolateral oblique [L MLO] and craniocaudal [L CC]) and one with a suspicion of malignancy score of 10% (right craniocaudal [R CC]), shown as polygonal overlays. Without AI, six of 10 readers (60%) marked a false-positive ROI. With AI assistance, this fell to two of 10 (20%). R MLO = right mediolateral oblique.](https://img.auntminnieeurope.com/mindful/smg/workspaces/default/uploads/2026/07/2026-07-14-radiology-mammogram-ai-auto-bias.H0bYO8QlWs.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=crop&h=112&q=70&w=112)






