Spy case raises questions on U.K. radiation response

Dec 3, 2006

LONDON (Reuters), Dec 4 - If the poisoning of one man can pose such a serious test for the British government, how would it handle a full-scale radiological attack?

A week after former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko was killed by the radioactive poison polonium-210, some security analysts see major flaws in the emergency response system and question its ability to cope with a larger crisis.

Among their chief concerns is the three weeks it took for doctors to establish that the dying Litvinenko had been poisoned by a nuclear substance.

"The man was radioactive in a hospital for weeks and nobody knew it. That's terrifying," said Robert Ayers, a former U.S. intelligence officer now working for London's Chatham House think-tank.

Independent nuclear expert John Large told Reuters: "It's taken us three to four weeks to literally get on the case. In terms of us being prepared for a radiological incident, this is a very bad portent."

He added: "Good heavens, we can't handle one radiation incident, let alone someone exploding a dirty bomb."

Security officials have been braced for years for the scenario of a dirty bomb -- a device containing a mix of explosives and radioactive material -- that might only kill a few people but would contaminate a wide area and spread panic.

But the detection challenge would be much greater, Ayers said, in the event of a more insidious attack such as spreading radioactive material in a public place where many people would be exposed and only gradually fall ill.

"What we should be focusing on is our ability to detect and react to events like this in the future," he said.

Radioactive trail

Since Litvinenko's death on November 23, investigations have gradually uncovered a radioactive trail across London of a dozen contaminated locations, some visited by the former Russian agent after he fell ill but others so far unexplained.

The government has reassured Britons that the risk is negligible, because polonium-210 is not dangerous unless swallowed, inhaled, or absorbed through a wound. But public unease grew with this week's disclosure that some 33,000 passengers have traveled in the past month on planes suspected of bearing traces of radioactivity.

The case has posed a severe communications test for the authorities.

With a major police investigation in progress, they have declined to give answers to some obvious questions, such as what material was found on board the planes and where.

And the mere fact of alerting tens of thousands of people to an issue as emotive as nuclear radiation is almost bound to spread alarm, experts said.

Mike Grannatt, a former government emergency planner, said the authorities were right to strive for openness, including by admitting the gaps in their knowledge.

"Saying 'We don't know yet, but we'll tell you,' is much more credible than trying to bluff your way through it," he told the BBC.

Home Secretary John Reid has pledged to draw lessons from the Litvinenko affair. But the communication challenge may, if anything, grow as the investigation widens.

"This ever-increasing story is now causing people a great deal of anxiety because we don't understand the origin of it, the pervasiveness of it, and what the real threat may be," Ayers said.

"What's going to be the announcement the day after tomorrow?"

By Mark Trevelyan

Last Updated: 2006-12-01 15:06:54 -0400 (Reuters Health)

Three in U.K. tested for radiation after spy death, November 27, 2006

Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.